Protecting Birds and Caribou from Drilling in the Arctic

Photograph by Subhankar Banerjee

Protecting Birds and Caribou from Drilling in the Arctic

An unprecedented management plan for the National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska could help balance domestic oil production and conservation.

By Alisa Opar
Published: 06/04/2012

UPDATE: On August 13 Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar announced the BLM's preferred management plan for the NPR-A, which is based on Alternative B, the option supported by Audubon and other conservation groups.

The name National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska might conjure images of desolate oil fields dotted with derricks. In fact this 22.8-million acre reserve in the northwestern part of the state encompasses a spectacular mix of Arctic ecosystems and provides critical habitat for a rich array of wildlife, from beluga whales and polar bears to caribou and millions of migratory birds, including increasingly rare species like the yellow-billed loon.

The NPR-A, the largest tract of public land in the United States, also holds an estimated 896 million barrels of oil, according to a 2010 USGS analysis--one-tenth of previous estimates, and about the amount the country uses in six weeks. Yet despite its name, since the reserve from the Navy to the Interior Department 36 years ago, petroleum extraction is not its sole purpose. In 1976, Congress mandated that "maximum protection" be put in place for "surface values," like wildlife and fish, to balance oil production, including identification of no-lease areas. It also authorized protections for "special areas," or critical wildlife habitat.

Now, for the first time ever, the federal government is developing a comprehensive management plan for the entire reserve. The public comment period ends June 15 (click here to voice your support). "From key oil and gas reserves, to the Teshekpuk and Western Arctic caribou herds, to the world-class breeding and nesting ground for numerous species of waterfowl, the NPR-A contains resources that must be considered and balanced in a way," said BLM-Alaska State Director Bud Cribley. Making lands available for oil development while protecting sensitive areas is in line with the Obama administration's strategy to "increase safe and responsible oil production here at home," as the president said in a May 14 address. A balanced plan, conservationists say, will protect the most important wildlife areas while still allowing responsible energy development in other parts of the reserve.

The Bureau of Land Management's plan lists four different options (pdf). They include Alternative A, making no changes; Alternative B, which would include the strongest protections for places critical to migratory birds, caribou, and marine mammals; Alternative C calls for far fewer protections and allows leasing in the Teshekpuk Lake goose molting habitat and the NPR-A's caribou calving grounds; and Alternative D, opening up the entire area to oil and gas leasing.

Under Alternative B, the government would be able to lease 11 million acres, or 48 percent, of the lands for oil and gas drilling. At the same time, 15.5 million acres in five "Special Areas" would be largely off-limits to leasing. Recommendations would also be made to Congress to designate 12 Wild and Scenic Rivers, a classification that ensures that the waterways will be kept free-flowing.

NPR-A Update
Illustration by Mike Reagan
Under Alternative B, Teshekpuk Lake, Colville River, Utukok River Uplands, Kasegaluk Lagoon, and Peard Bay would be designated as Special Areas. Click here to send a letter in support of Alternative B by June 15.

"Many in the environmental realm feel that Alternative B is the best, most balanced approach," says Suzanne Little, manager of Pew's Western Lands Initiative who lives in Anchorage. "It provides plenty of opportunity for oil and gas development while putting in place protections for the most sensitive places."

If selected, Alternative B would provide the strongest protection possible under the plan for Teshekpuk Lake, the largest lake north of Alaska's Brooks Range. There tens of thousands of Pacific brants, white-fronted, snow, and Canada geese congregate and molt, and bar-tailed godwits raise their young and fatten up before making their remarkable 7,000-mile direct flight to New Zealand in the fall. Calving grounds for hundreds of thousands of caribou would be off-limits to leasing, too. And sensitive areas along the coasts of the Beaufort and Chukchi seas, where belugas give birth in near-shore waters, walruses haul out, and polar bears rest, would be safeguarded. Such life rafts are becoming even more important as the sea ice these species depend on shrinks as the Arctic warms.

Magazine Category

Author Profile

Alisa Opar

Alisa Opar is the articles editor at Audubon magazine. Follow her on Twitter @alisaopar.

Type: Author | From: Audubon Magazine

Comments

I vote for plan A do not do

I vote for plan A do not do anything there, leave it alone. Even if they start small like they claim in plan B they will eventually take more and more. No animals should suffer for oil.

protect sensitive wildlife habitat

Keep intact the maximum protection for this wildlife refuge, please!

National Petroleum Reserve

I'm tired of big oil. Leave it as is. (Plan A) When will we ever learn. The creatures of our planet always lose to big oil.

Add comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.