The Battle Over a North Carolina Beach Continues

The Battle Over a North Carolina Beach Continues

Page 2

One of the negotiators was Golder. “They stacked the committee with ORV interests,” he reports. “People were screaming and yelling obscenities at us. The threats got bad enough that we asked to be seated so we didn’t have our backs to the audience. People were picketing along the roads and standing at the entrances with all these hideous signs about how awful Audubon was. The ORV folks’ position was not to give in on anything that reduced vehicle access.”

Another negotiator, who requested anonymity, told me that his participation was “the worst thing he ever did,” that the process was “extremely contentious,” and that “the motorized faction was ugly, outrageous, and in your face.” He’s had to give up his passion, surf fishing, because he believes his life would be in danger if he set foot on the beach.

Negotiators who defended wildlife had nails thrown in their driveways, were refused service at restaurants, and were warned to look under their cars before starting them. Directions to their houses were posted on the Internet. Their photos and names were printed on “wanted” posters worn on T-shirts and hung in public places, including at least one post office (though without authorization). A typical poster read: “Wanted for the economic ruin of Hatteras Island. The man is one of the leaders of the beach ban. Consider him dangerous to your livelihoods and recreation.”

On March 30, 2009, after 14 months, 11 committee meetings, and scores of subcommittee meetings and workshops, facilitators of negotiated rulemaking gave up. This was just as well because the Park Service was then able to depend more on advice of wildlife scientists for the final plan. It’s hard to figure why, before the implosion of negotiated rulemaking, the agency felt constrained to ignore the advice of those scientists (many of whom it employs), seeking instead the advice of ORV operators who, for example, believe and publicly state that piping plovers are invasive exotics.

 

The seashore’s enabling legislation requires that it be managed primarily as “primitive wilderness.” But seashore leadership seems never to have grasped a central fact about wilderness—that it’s for everyone but not everyone all at once. Otherwise, it dries up and blows away like an African waterhole rendered by elephants to dust.

Primitive wilderness was hardly what I encountered this past May in the vast areas still open to ORVs. Our first stop was South Beach, especially important to birds because of the rich food sources and excellent nesting habitat. Audubon had urged the Park Service to restrict parking to a back road and require visitors to walk the several hundred feet to the beach. Instead, the final plan allows motorists to drive and park on the intertidal zone. Along two miles of beach we counted two ruddy turnstones, a brown pelican, several dozen laughing gulls, and 348 ORVs, many parked so close together that doors could barely open.

Under the final plan, 28 of the seashore’s 67 miles are designated for year-round vehicle use, while 26 miles are set aside for pedestrians and wildlife. Except during peak tourism season, ORVs have access to the remaining 13 miles. While small sections may be temporarily closed to allow birds and sea turtles to nest, motorized access will be enhanced by new ramps.

Compared to other national seashores this is extremely generous to off-road motorists. For example, the Cape Cod National Seashore occasionally permits ORVs on 8.5 of the 25 beach miles it manages for ORVs. But because of bird breeding and ocean conditions, it more frequently restricts them to much less and sometimes none. On Florida’s Canaveral National Seashore, beach driving is forbidden.

Also under the final plan, ORV operators must, for the first time, buy permits—$50 for a week or $120 for a year. To hear it from the local access crowd this is extortion, but it’s the norm at other seashores. The money will help fund enforcement and implementation.

Despite the vehicle invasion at South Beach and elsewhere, I saw wilderness on beaches open only to pedestrians and of course on the Atlantic, where kite surfers were going airborne over waves. Two hundred yards out big rollers from a storm far to the south reared up into breakers, white manes trailing in the wind. Churning sand painted near-shore waters multiple shades of yellow, green, turquoise, and blue; a fog of spindrift, silver in the noonday sun, hung up and down the beach for miles. It wasn’t hard to see why Americans love the seashore or why the Park Service has had such a hard time keeping them from loving it to death.

The local mindset was written on vehicles registered in North Carolina, all with fishing-rod racks. The latest bumper sticker is a rendering of a fist clutching a tern with middle finger raised over the caption “Hey, Audubon, Identify This Bird.” Larger renditions of this classy finger salutation were plastered on businesses and residences and, incredibly, a few feet from a school.

Virtually all the nastiness issues from fishermen who fish from ORVs and some Outer Banks residents. But most vehicles I saw on South Beach had Virginia plates. Few of the Virginians were fishing. Instead they were sunbathing, picnicking, tossing balls and Frisbees, digging in the sand, swimming, surfboarding, and kite surfing. This weekend was a high point in their year. Any advocate of the human race would warm quickly to them. Despite the binoculars hanging from our necks, they smiled and waved at us. The revelers weren’t driving on the beach; they were just parked on it. They’d have been just as happy or happier if they’d been required to park on the road behind the dunes.

Magazine Category

Author Profile

Ted Williams

Ted Williams is freelance writer.

Type: Author | From: Audubon Magazine

Comments

http://adjustableairbeds.org/

Beach closures

Fishermen and birders alike should just keep going south to Ocracoke Island. While there is some friction here over this issue, it is a much more civil discussion. There is plenty of reason to have a discussion and there are some ways the NPS could accomplish its mission while still being more open to the concerns expressed by the beach drivers. Bottom line: come to Ocracoke - more open beach than closed, more open minded than closed. Welcome ALL.

I have been vacationing to

I have been vacationing to the Outer Banks since 1971 and have been driving on Hatteras since the early 1990's. I am not one of those motorheads who believe that Hatteras seashore exists for them to drive unencumbered upon. I am also a birder and lover of the seashore. I would not under any circumstance drive in an area in which plovers were nesting or could nest. I have volunterred on several sea turtle projects along the East Coast and adopted one nest in Kill Devil Hills in 2002. I also own property in OBX and spend most of my summers there in one of them, rotating between properties in Avon and Kill Devil Hills. What has happened in Hatteras is that the motor heads believe the beach exists for them. Period. They complain about the density of trucks due to beach closures, but all this indicates is that too many vehicles are permitted. The thugs that run around forcing local businesses to put the anti plover stickers in their windows are pathetic. One of them threatened me last fall in a bar/resturant in Nags Head (I was wearing an Audobon Gulf Coast Christmas bird count tee shirt). A couple of his rabble friends stood up, but when they saw who I was with (a former Purdue U linebacker), they quietly sat backed down. He then advised me to "keep an eye on my care". For those of you who don't drive on the beaches, you should know that what happens in the summer high season is not a line up of people fishing. It's a line up of people parking and primarily drinking. The beach basically becomes a tailgate party equal to a tailgate party on a fall afternoon at any major college football venue. Old time OBX off-road fishermen do not frequent the beaches during this time frame due to this scene. We go in March - April and then after September. This isn't about hurting OBX econcomies - this is about extreme anti-government politicians that use propaganda and misinformation to rouse up the rabble. Nothing more. Nothing less.

Audubon society is a

Audubon society is a communist organization that hates children.

Audubon society is a

Audubon society is a communist organization that hates children.

Cape Hatteras Natl. Seashore

The situation at CHNS involving ORVs and their miscreant operators is bizarre. It's a travesty when a few narrowly focused people believe that they can own a place that was set aside to protect an entire ecosystem for all visitors not just a perverse few. The last time we visited CHNS, the ORV people were so contentious and rude that I gave up fishing and left for a more amenable place two states away. From many of the comments I've heard from them, there is no amount of science based data that could change their misguided minds. They are misfits who need to go.

Cape Hatteras Natl. Seashore

It's a shame that a few individuals can try to disrupt and sabotage efforts to protect some of our ecological treasures so that they may pursue their narrow interests. The last time I visited CHNS, ORVs and their operators were so contentious that I gave up trying to fish and left for more peaceful and pristine locations two states away. Our National Seashores are created to protect ecosystems, not to favor a few who care nothing about nature and only about themselves.

The Battle Over a North Carolina Beach Continues | Audubon

We take action because that's what's worked for all of us in similar situations within the past.
As you may already know, women say deep voices are attractive than normal or high-pitched squeaky voices.
The Chanel clutch that Amanda Bynes carried for the red carpet for
that 2011 MTV Movie Awards held at Universal Studios Gibson Amphitheatre last night features a half dome silhouette and is made from soft,
quilted lambskin.

Open all beaches

Orv do not hurt wildlife. If it wasn't for the fishing there would be no cape Hatteras. How do you people sleep at night knowing your hurting so many business by trying to do something so stupid by trying to close beaches. The Audubon are nothing but complete liars and fakes. I will continue to drive on the beach how I want and will not hurt and wildlife. I can't wait till the OBPA wins and anyone who even says the word Audubon will be kicked off the island.

Perhaps when those who use

Perhaps when those who use the beach this way (and perhaps born with less than normal sized reproductive organs) and feel they have some God given right to destroy everything in sight will eventually come to see their rights stop when their actions affect others negatively. This includes negatively affected wildlife.

Add comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
8 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.