Has One Florida Dam's Day Finally Come?
At a spot 30 feet from the impoundment’s south shore, Ahlers signaled Condon and me to stop paddling. “We’re over Blue Spring,” she said. “I swam in it when I was a kid. It was canopied, and its run to the Ocklawaha was almost a mile long. There were so many fish. . . .” And her voice trailed off.
Blue Spring is one of at least 20 springs destroyed by the dam. Not only are they inundated but the weight of water suppresses the flow that used to maintain water quality in the St. Johns system. These springs and Silver Springs provided important cold-weather refuge to manatees, now endangered. All but a few that slip through the lock are eliminated from the reservoir and upper river. Springs still accessible to manatees elsewhere in Florida are drying up as groundwater is diverted for human use. So manatees increasingly depend on heated outfall from power plants. But some of these sources are drying up, too, as plants shift to closed cooling systems. According to Katie Tripp, director of science and conservation for Save the Manatee, a restored Ocklawaha would “provide hundreds and hundreds of manatees with winter habitat and get them away from artificial, unreliable sources of warm water.”
Paddling north again, we entered a ghost forest of moldering trees on part of the national forest right-of-way that hadn’t been cleared. Most had rotted off at 18 feet and, with the reservoir not yet full, protruded four feet above the surface. But every few minutes we fetched up on stumps just below the surface and hidden by the dirty water. The impoundment is a scary, dangerous place, especially for motorboats. So many props and lower units had broken off on stumps that the bass-boat lobby prevailed on the Florida Department of Environmental Protection to raise the level from 18 feet to between 20 and 21 feet, thereby drowning 5,300 additional acres of public forest. “Watching this and the rest of the forest die over 40 years was sickening,” remarked Ahlers.
From 1966 to 1968 she also watched the clearing, much of it done by the caterpillar-treaded, 22-foot-high, 306-ton “Crusher Crawler” built at the Jacksonville Shipyard. “The mechanical marvel . . . mows down trees and pushed them underground as though they were matchsticks,” effused the Orlando Sentinel. And that was the problem. The dead wood provides an endless source of nutrients for alien weeds. Governor Chiles called the Crusher Crawler a “colossal failure,” complaining that trees kept “popping up like corks, and the Corps is now having to spend tremendous sums of money keeping a dredge out picking up the logs, piling them on the banks for burning.” They’re still popping up today, but now they just accumulate along the shore.
"We do not build dams for religious purposes,” as former Interior Secretary and river advocate Bruce Babbitt liked to say. We just keep them for religious purposes, and in Florida that would be competitive bass fishing. But the pro-Rodman ranks may be thinning. Senators Kirkpatrick and King are dead. Mayor-Commissioner Long is out of office. And thanks to the FDE and the Florida Wildlife Federation, the Forest Service appears to have been rousted from timidity and torpor.
After I’d said goodbye to my companions I drove up onto the dam. Gazing out over the brown, stump-filled, snag-lined expanse of reservoir, I recalled two passages I’d copied into my notes from Ditch of Dreams—one from the Florida Waterways Committee’s 1962 promo: “Several hundred miles of waterfront property will be created by the Canal—thousands of acres of beautiful crystal clear lakes will surge into being . . . with sandy shores and beaches providing countless, unlimited natural swimming, picnic, and camping areas.” The other passage, a 1970 pronouncement by the Corps, reads as follows: “The barge canal will save the Ocklawaha from nature.”
But Nathaniel Reed, who fights as tirelessly for fish and wildlife now as when he helped run Nixon’s Interior Department, told me this: “What a great example of restoration it would be to remove the Rodman Dam. Let’s watch and marvel over the revegetation of the empty flats and cheer as the clear, clean river runs its merry way into the St. Johns.”
In Rodman’s frothy discharge I watched anglers catching some of the mullet that had stacked up along the dam’s base. I hadn’t known it was possible to entice these herbivores to a hook. Except during drawdowns this is about the only place around the reservoir accessible to shore anglers. And during those brief drawdowns the floodplain explodes with green as native seeds swept down from the Ocklawaha germinate, only to drown a few weeks later. Unflooded sections clearcut for the canal are now indistinguishable from the untouched forest I’d paddled through. Given a chance, bottomland forests heal fast here.
What You Can Do
Leading the charge to restore the Ocklawaha is Florida Defenders of the Environment. To support their effort and learn about the latest developments, go to fladefenders.org/joinfde.php. If you live in Florida, urge Governor Scott to be true to his Tea Party roots and save you and your fellow taxpayers $1 million a year by removing Rodman Dam.
- « first
- ‹ previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4


An Ecological Slum
Ms. Lawler: I took nothing “out of context.” You cited and posted incorrect information. And I corrected it. I never imagined that the numbers were yours; if they had been, I’d have noted that you have no more credibility or credentials than Ed Taylor. Taylor is not a “reliable source” as Karen Chadwick, Paul Nosca and others clearly demonstrate here. Nor is Florida DEP a “reliable source” for reasons I explained. The notion that a river meandering through naturally forested wetlands could somehow be “purified” by a thermally polluted, fetid, de-oxygenated stew of decaying alien vegetation and herbicides is preposterous. No ecologically literate person could believe this. If Lake Watch makes that claim, it provides us only with information about Lake Watch, not the reservoir. I have no doubt that the U.S. Forest Service (not the “National Forest Service”) estimated 75 years for re-growth. So what? Even if that estimate were accurate (and it clearly is not, because being underwater would not retard regrowth as is evident by the rapid regrowth just during the drawdowns), do you contend that we should not think about the generations who will enjoy this naturally renewed forest 75-100 years hence? That’s only one human lifetime. Again, $25.8 million is a terrific deal as dam removal goes. Check out the removal costs of equally useless dams that are coming down all across the U.S. What’s more, removal is a money maker. It would be an investment that would pay for itself in only 19 years even if you didn’t add all the values of a restored natural river and just figured the cost of maintaining the reservoir ($1.3 million a year). If you did add those values, removal would pay for itself in a year or two. What we absolutely do NOT need at this point is more “conversation” between those who value wild rivers and those who do not. It is impossible by nature for such talk to be “constructive.” Dam fans have been talking since the 1960s. The time for talk is over. Now is the time for action. You may “cherish the environment.” But you obviously do not cherish the NATURAL environment. A slum is an “environment.” And Rodman Reservoir is an ecological slum.