Help End the Bluefin Blues

Photograph by Simon Ager/Flickr Creative Commons

Help End the Bluefin Blues

Proposed fishing regulations could help this threatened tuna, but advocates say they're not enough.

By Ted Williams
Published: 11/07/2013

The best one-word description of the bluefin tuna is "superfish." Unlike most fish, it is warm-blooded. Paired arteries and veins with opposite directions of flow act as heat exchangers, limiting heat loss. Instead of pumping water through its gills as most fish do, it reverses the process, pushing its immense gills through water, double-hinged mouth agape, supercharging itself with oxygen like a ramjet. Its fins fold into grooves. Its tail is equipped with horizontal stabilizers. These adaptations allow it to hit bursts of 55 mph.

And it offers arguably the best eating of all fish--nothing like the dry, white "tuna" (usually albacore) that comes in cans. Bluefin is prized for sushi and sashimi, and a single midsize bluefin of about 500 pounds can sell for several hundred thousand dollars. So the species is in desperate trouble.

If one were to design a prescription for commercial extinction of the western bluefin population, it would be this: Kill spawning adults in their only known spawning habitat, the Gulf of Mexico.

Yet this is precisely what America does. In 1981 the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) banned directed longline fishing for bluefins. But it still permits longliners, who festoon the Gulf with thousands of miles of line that dangle millions of baited hooks, to kill bluefins by accident as they target abundant yellowfin tuna. In fact, U.S. longliners now kill more bluefins by accident than they killed on purpose before 1981.

To discourage a directed fishery, the NMFS requires most of this bluefin "bycatch"--usually brought to the boat dead--to be discarded. But each longliner may keep and sell up to three bluefins per trip. So there's no motivation to limit kill.

Last August the NMFS proposed a partial and belated fix--prohibiting surface longlining in a small section of the Gulf during April and May (only part of bluefin spawning season) and requiring that bycatch be retained. In the prohibited area longliners could switch to a highly efficient and selective method of yellowfin fishing called "greensticking," in which multiple squid lures are trolled. In a one-year, four-vessel trial, greensticks caught no bluefins.

And bluefin bycatch would be capped, requiring a longliner who went over his quota to quit fishing or "lease" unused quota from another longliner. Detailed logs of all catches would be mandatory, verified by onboard video cameras automatically turned on when longlines are pulled.

"The proposal is a step in the right direction, but the gear-restricted area needs to be for the whole Gulf and include March," says Tom Wheatley, who manages the Gulf Surface Longline Campaign for The Pew Charitable Trusts.

Agreeing with Wheatley on the need for a larger, longer Gulf closure are Ken Hinman of Wild Oceans; Carl Safina of the Blue Ocean Institute; and Captain John McMurray, one of America's most respected bluefin fishing guides. And all deplore the part of the proposal that takes bycatch quota from anglers, purse seiners, and harpooners and gives it to longliners.

"The draft rule," observes Hinman, "seems designed to accommodate and institutionalize bluefin bycatch rather than eliminate it."

"The idea is supposedly to limit longliners' bluefin bycatch," Safina says. "And yet NMFS wants to give them more. The logic eludes me."

No one stands to lose more than McMurray if the game of musical chairs with quotas is implemented. Still, he acknowledges that, even as written, the draft rule provides "incentive to avoid catching bluefins."

The NMFS is accepting public comments until December 10. Urge it to prohibit surface longlining throughout the entire Gulf from March through May and transfer no bluefin quota from other fisheries.

Comments can be registered electronically, by fax (978-281-9340, Attn: Tom Warren), or by regular mail (Tom Warren, Highly Migratory Species Management Division, NMFS, Northeast Regional Office, 55 Great Republic Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930).

Magazine Category

Author Profile

Ted Williams

Ted Williams is freelance writer.

Type: Author | From: Audubon Magazine

Comments

Veganism is the quickest and

Veganism is the quickest and most efficient path to complete destruction of the earth at the hands of the human race. In order to provide for a complete exchange from an omnivorous to an herbivorous national population, the United States would be forced to dedicate millions of acres of natural ecosystems to the production of fruits and vegetables; thus annihilating millions of acres of wildlife habitats. Though assuredly inhumane, concentrated animal feed operations (CAFO's), are the most efficient means of preserving wildlife habitat and subsequently maintaining a sustainable amount of acreage to which we can dedicate the growth of consumption plants. Furthermore, if you truly are as ecologically-minded as is implied by your above comment, you would understand that your suggestion would only further the degradation of the world's wildlife habitats. Until self-proclaimed environmentalists actually examine the data and propose economically and ecologically viable alternatives to America's astoundingly symbiotic means of natural resource extractions, it would be advised that these "environmentalists" put away their picket signs and megaphones for the time being.

Veganism is the quickest and

Veganism is the quickest and most efficient path to complete destruction of the earth at the hands of the human race. In order to provide for a complete exchange from an omnivorous to an herbivorous national population, the United States would be forced to dedicate millions of acres of natural ecosystems to the production of fruits and vegetables; thus annihilating millions of acres of wildlife habitats. Though assuredly inhumane, concentrated animal feed operations (CAFO's), are the most efficient means of preserving wildlife habitat and subsequently maintaining a sustainable amount of acreage to which we can dedicate the growth of consumption plants. Furthermore, if you truly are as ecologically-minded as is implied by your above comment, you would understand that your suggestion would only further the degradation of the world's wildlife habitats. Until self-proclaimed environmentalists actually examine the data and propose economically and ecologically viable alternatives to America's astoundingly symbiotic means of natural resource extractions, it would be advised that these "environmentalists" put away their picket signs and megaphones for the time being.

We need heavier regulation on

We need heavier regulation on the take of blue fin tuna and other to make sure we have supplies for our future and help keep the ocean in balance.

A healthy use of Earths

A healthy use of Earths resources is the only way to ensure that the people who come after us have enough to eat and that the species stay healthy as well.

We need to stop eating them

We need to stop eating them all together. Veganism is the only path that will save the earth from complete destruction by the human race.

We need to stop eating them

We need to stop eating them all together. Veganism is the only path that will save the earth from complete destruction by the human race.

Veganism is the quickest and

Veganism is the quickest and most efficient path to complete destruction of the earth at the hands of the human race. In order to provide for a complete exchange from an omnivorous to an herbivorous national population, the United States would be forced to dedicate millions of acres of natural ecosystems to the production of fruits and vegetables; thus annihilating millions of acres of wildlife habitats. Though assuredly inhumane, concentrated animal feed operations (CAFO's), are the most efficient means of preserving wildlife habitat and subsequently maintaining a sustainable amount of acreage to which we can dedicate the growth of consumption plants. Furthermore, if you truly are as ecologically-minded as is implied by your above comment, you would understand that your suggestion would only further the degradation of the world's wildlife habitats. Until self-proclaimed environmentalists actually examine the data and propose economically and ecologically viable alternatives to America's astoundingly symbiotic means of natural resource extractions, it would be advised that these "environmentalists" put away their picket signs and megaphones for the time being.

Add comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.