Everglades Pythons Exhibit New Behaviors

Everglades Pythons Exhibit New Behaviors

Page 2

“What Americans need to do is turn their attention to invasives as homeland security issues and something that has obscene costs to the taxpayer and the environment,” Graham says. Each year invasive species cause $120 billion in damage in the United States (PDF). Since 2005, state and federal agencies, along with other organizations, have spent $6 million responding to invasive constrictor snakes in the Everglades and more than $101 million on the recovery of the wood stork, which is just one of the endangered species pythons prey upon. By allowing potential invasive species into the region, we stand to lose hundreds of millions of dollars already invested in the Everglades ecosystem.

Graham has a potential solution for the aliens: Create economic incentives for their removal, a method used with moderate success to eradicate other invasive species like the nutria, a rodent plaguing the Gulf States.

In its native Southeast Asia, the Burmese python, captured in large numbers for the pet and leather trade, is a threatened species. Ironically, the practice that has driven their numbers down has also brought them, as pets, to a new range where they are growing stronger every day. Human management, says Graham, can continue to shape the python’s fate and, with it, the fate of the surrounding ecosystem.

*The article originally stated that the boa constrictor was also part of the ban. The text has been corrected. 

Magazine Category

Author Profile

Daisy Yuhas

Type: Author | From: Audubon Magazine

Comments

I used to really value the

I used to really value the articles you wrote and thought of them as factually based. However, it just looks like you are jumping on the HSUS band wagon of shoddy "science" and unproven "facts". I'm disappointed in you.

ad hominem

Huh? You're just calling this a "bandwagon" and name calling without any explanation. You make no argument other than that you don't agree, I guess. I'm not sure why you dislike the Humane Society, but just because something is potentially bad or invasive, and this is mentioned in an article, doesn't mean it's a sensationalistic article.

As I find it interesting as a

As I find it interesting as a scientist that these snakes are eating bird eggs, I also find the assumptions you make about this invasive population alarming and disheartening. You show only one side of the argument about this species and do not site the other studies done on this snake that show the species is unable to move further north. I also agree with the other person who posted on here. Shame on you Audubon.

Adapting?

In January of 2010 - 53 female Burmese Pythons with tracking devices were found dead in the Everglades after a lengthy cold snap. So how is it the lower 1/3 of the United States is suitable habitat? The co-author of Mazzotti's paper has already back tracked and suggested they were not suggesting mammal population declines were caused by pythons, they were simply offering data and allowing others to draw that conclusion. Nice science. That whole study was terrible science. They compared road kill counts in the ENP to Ranger data on roadkill in the 90's. Different methods. Different environmental conditions. The pythons ARE a problem. But sound science and rational reporting needs to lead the fight against them. Not sensationalism.

footnotes

Where did you get your statistics? Why were there no credible references cited so the accuracy of your article can be checked? Without this information included in your article, I have NO CHOICE but to conclude your statistics are blown out of porportion to use as a scare tactic. You should be ashamed.

Add comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.